Indicadores de desempeño para evaluar las Infraestructuras de Datos Espaciales

Lola Jiménez-Calderón; José Yépez-Campoverde; Antonio Vázquez-Hoehne

doi:10.3989/estgeogr.201706

Authors

Lola Jiménez-Calderón Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-6450
José Yépez-Campoverde Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-5903
Antonio Vázquez-Hoehne Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-8203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/estgeogr.201706

Keywords:

spatial data infrastructure, SDI indicators, SDI monitoring, SDI assessment, usability

Abstract

The importance of geographic information in decision-making and the ability of Spatial Data Infrastructures to transform government actions from a spatial perspective have placed the IDE as a fundamental solution in decision-making at many levels. In view of its relevance and major investments in this area, there is great interest in different sectors of society to observe the impact of the IDE, its evolution and future scenarios. This creates the need for an assessment of its impact, to obtain an approximate measure the success of these initiatives. This requires the availability of reliable mechanisms of evaluation from different approaches and objectives, which does not prevent, despite having a wide variety of studies and proposals, remains a difficult task. As part of the evaluation and monitoring IDE there is a variety of approaches using performance indicators as valid to estimate their development mechanism. In this context it is noted, the effort of experts and organizations, by agreeing a method to evaluate the IDE on the one hand and to define indicators, which are the essential part of various methodological approaches on the other. Given that the indicators are principally a desire to measure, marked differences in purpose of evaluation, the name and scope of the indicators themselves are observed, which indicates there is still much work to be done. This article presents a comparative analysis of the use of indicators for monitoring and evaluation of IDE development, which has been considered the study of five major initiatives: IDEC of Catalonia, GIDEON the Netherlands, eSDI-Net + e INSPIRE European and UN-GGIM of America.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdolmajidi, E., Mansourian, A. y Harrie, L. (2013): "The stock-flow model of spatial data infrastructure development refined by fuzzy logic", International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 9, artículo en revision.

Bennett, R. y Rajabifard, A. (2009): "Spatially enabling government: A snapshot from Victoria", en B. Ostendorf, P. Baldock, D. Bruce, M. Burdett, P. Corcoran, (eds.), Proceedings of the Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial International Conference, Adelaide, Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute, pp. 53-64.

Bonnefoy, J. y Armijo, M. (2005): "Indicadores de desempe-o en el sector público", Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social , http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/2/23572/manual45.pdf (fecha de consulta: 2/6/2014).

Carpenter, J. y Snell, J. (2013): "Tendencias a futuro en la gestión de información geoespacial: La visión de cinco a diez a-os", Ordenance Survey , http://ggim.un.org/docs/UN-GGIM/tenden cias/futuro/DEF.pdf (fecha de consulta: 15/3/2014).

Castelein, W., Bregt, A. y Pluijmers, Y. (2010): "The economic value of the Dutch geo- Information sector", International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 5, pp. 58-76.

Castelein, W. y Manso, M. (2010): "Monitoring of spatial data infrastructures", Universidad Politécnica de Madrid , http://www.idee.es/resources/presentaciones/JIIDE10/ ID402_Monitoring_of_Spatial_Data_Infrastructures.pdf (fecha de consulta: 15/3/2014).

CP-IDEA, (2013): "Diagnoses on relevant topics of geospatial information management and development of spatial data infrastructures (SDI) in countries of the Americas 2013", Tenth United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for the Americas, Prepared by Working Group on Planning (GTplan), http://unstats.un.org/ unsd/geoinfo/RCC/docs/rcca10/E_Conf_103_13_CPIDEA_Diagnostico2013_Final.pdf (fecha de consulta: 10/6/2014).

Crompvoets, J., Bregt, A., Rajabifard, A. y Williamson, I. (2004): "Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses", International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18/7, pp. 665-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810410001702030

Crompvoets, J., Rajabifard, A., Loenen, B. y Delgado T. (eds.) (2008): A Multi-View framework to assess spatial data infrastructures. Published jointly, Space for Geo-Information (RGI), Wageningen University and Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne.

Delgado, T. y Crompvoets, J. (2007): " Infraestructuras de Datos Espaciales en Iberoamérica y el Caribe: evaluación y potenciación de infraestructuras de datos espaciales para el desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe, La Habana, editorial IDICT, p. 212.

Duformont, H. (2004): "Results Task Force XIA Luxembourg", Task Force Discussion Workshops, http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/reports/inspire_extended_impact_assessment.pdf (fecha de consulta: 03/2/2014).

Eelderink, L., Crompvoets, J., y de Man, W. (2008): "Towards key variables to assess national spatial data infrastructures (NSDIs) in developing countries", en J. Crompvoets, (ed.), A Multi-View Framework to Assess SDIs, Melbourne, Space for Geo-Information (RGI), Wageningen University, pp. 173-192.

Garcia, P., Moix, M., y Queraltó, P. (2008): "The socioeconomic impact of the spatial data infrastructure of Catalonia. Luxembourg", Joint Research Centre, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/reports/Study_reports/catalonia_impact_study_report.pdf (fecha de consulta: 3/6/2014).

Genovese, E., Cotteret, G., Caron, C., y Feick, R. (2009): "Evaluating the socioeconomic impact of geographic information: A classification of the literature", International Journal, 4, pp. 218-238.

Giff, G. y Crompvoets, J. (2008): "Performance indicators a tool to support spatial data infrastructure assessment", Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32/5, pp. 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.001

Grus, L., Crompvoets, J. y Bregt, A. (2007): "Multi-view SDI assessment framework". International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, pp. 33-53.

Guimet, J. (2009): "Evaluación IDEs: Significado, metodología, utilidad y experiencias", VI Jornades JIDEE, http://www.idee.es/resources/presentaciones/GTIDEE_Murcia_2009/ARTICULOS_JIDEE2009/Articulo-27.pdf (fecha de consulta: 8/2/2014).

INSPIRE (2009): "Commission decision regarding INSPIRE monitoring and reporting implementing Directive 2007/2/EC", The European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring andreporting, http://eur-lex.europa. andreporting, http://eur-lex. europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:148:0018:0026:EN:PDF (fecha de consulta: 18/5/2014).

Masser, I. (2009): "Changing notions of a spatial data infrastructure", SDI convergence, 48, pp. 219-228.

Masser, I., Rajabifard, A. y Williamson, I. (2007): "Spatially enabling governments through SDI implementation", International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22/1, pp. 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601177751

Rix, J., Fast, S., Masser, I., Salgé, F. y Vico, F. (2011): "Methodology to describe, analyse and assess subnational SDIs: survey, experiences and lessons learnt", International Journal of Spatial Data , 6.

Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A. y Williamson, I. (2008): "Evaluation and performance indicators to assess spatial data infrastructure initiatives", en J. Crompvoets, (ed.), A Multi-View Framework to Assess SDIs, Melbourne, Space for Geo-Information (RGI), Wageningen University, pp. 193-210.