The Spatial Planning Models in Europe: France, Germany and United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/estgeogr.201111Keywords:
land management, models, Europe, France, Germany, United KingdomAbstract
In the European Union, the public administrations manage the territory to face to the consequences of reduction of the cost of transport and of the urban development, to favor the territorial and social cohesion. The decision made by the States and the local administrations concern the construction of infrastructures, the politics of housing and the provision of services. In this aspect, the levels in which the decisions are made have a special importance. Likewise, the specificities of the national histories, political-administrative organization and political cultures affect in the elaborated and later implemented policies of land management by the members states, though the consolidation of the European construction favors the convergence of the national models.
Downloads
References
Aalbu, H. (2004): “Europa policéntrica:Utopía o realidad?”, en J. Romero y J. Farinos (eds.): Ordenación del Territorio y desarrollo territorial. Gijón, Trea.
Anderson, J. (1992): The Territorial Imperative. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664137
Atkinson, R. (2001): “The Emerging Urban Agenda and the European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards an EU Urban Policy?”. European Planning Studies, 9, 3, pp. 385-406.
Blanc, J. (1994): Finances locales et aménagement du territoire. París, Crédit local de France-Délégation à l’aménagement du territoire et à l’action régionale.
Bouazza Ariño, O. (2009): La planificación territorial en Gran Bretaña. Cizur Menor, Thomas-Civitas.
Buzelay, A. y Hannequart, A. (1994): Problématique régionale et cohésion dans la Communauté européenne. París, Economica.
Comision Europea (1999): Estrategia Territorial Europea. Hacia un desarrollo equilibrado y sostenible de la UE. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_es.pdf (consultado 28/02/2011).
Direccion General de Politica Regional (2004): Informe Intermedio sobre Cohesion Territorial. Luxemburgo, Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/coheter/coheter_es.pdf (consultado 28/02/2011).
Christaller, W. (1933): Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena, Fischer.
France. Comité de décentralisation (1990): Rapport du Comité de décentralisation à Monsieur le Premier Ministre. 1989. Paris : Comité de décentralisation.
France. Délégation à l’aménagement du territoire et à l’action régionale (DATAR) (1990): Une nouvelle étape pour l’aménagement du territoire. Paris, La Documentation française.
France. Délégation à l’aménagement du territoire et à l’action régionale (DATAR) (1993): Débat national pour l’aménagement du territoire, document introductif. Paris, La Documentation française.
France. Délégation à l’aménagement du territoire et à l’action régionale (DATAR) (1994): Débat national pour l’aménagement du territoire, document d’étape. Paris, La Documentation française. EPSON (2005), Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Project 111 report.Luxemburgo.
Faludi, A. (2004), “Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP Process”. International Planning Studies, 9, 3, pp. 155-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356347042000311758
Faludi, A. (2004): “Territorial Cohesion: Old Wine in New Bottles?”. Urban Studies, 41, 7, pp. 1349-1365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000214833
Gerbaux, F. y Muller, P. (1992): “Les interventions économiques locales”. Pouvoirs, 60.
Gremion, P. (1976): Le pouvoir périphérique. París, Seuil.
Guichard, O. (1976): Vivre ensemble, rapport de la Commission de développement des responsabilités locales. París, La Documentation française.
Hall, P. (1992): Urban and Regional Planing. Londres-Nueva York, Routledge.
Janin, U. y Faludi, A. (2005): “The Hidden Face of European Spatial Planning: innovation in Governance”. European Planning Studies, 13, 2, pp. 195-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000321785
Laborie, J-P. y al. (1985): La politique française d’aménagement du territoire de 1950 à 1985. Paris, La Documentation française.
Marcou, G., Kistenmacher, H. y Clev, H.G. (1994): L’Aménagement du territoire en France et en Allemagne. París, La Documentation française.
Martínez, E. (2006): “European Territorial Strategy: The limites of a balanced and polycentric system of towns”, XVI Congreso de Estudios Vascos, San Sebastian.
Parti Socialiste (1980): “Projet socialiste pour la France”, en France des années 80. París, Club Socialiste du livre.
Perroux, F. (1993): François Perroux, oeuvres complètes, 6 tomes. Grenoble, Presse Universitaires de Grenoble.
Sadran, P. (1992): Le système administratif. París, Montchrestien.
Shaw, D. y Sykes, O. (2004): “The Concept of Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: Reflections on the Interpretation and Application in the Practice of Spatial Planning”. International Planning Studies, 9, 4, pp. 283-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563470500050437
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
